ADVERTISEMENT

Football Satterfield Contract Details

Guys, I won't post the whole thing, since it's on The Athletic, but meant to post the tweet from Justin Williams yesterday. Via a public records request with UC, here's some details from Satterfield's contract. I can tell you the $7.25 million pool for the assistants jumps out the most for me. For perspective, Fickell's Bearcats staff this season had $5.25 million. And at Nebraska, Matt Rhule's staff will get $7 million.

Login to view embedded media

Football scoop reports on UC’s staff…


Summary:

defense: Bryan Brown DC (has also coached CB), Derek Nicholson ILB

offense: Pete Thomas QB, Nic Cardwell OL

off field: Mark Speir, and Cartrr Wilson recruiting and scouting
  • Like
Reactions: epdoc

Football Brohm Official to Louisville

From what I'm told, it sounds like this was just about put in place last week, between Louisville and Jeff Brohm. It sounds like had Satterfield not taken the UC job, he might have been fired. So the timing worked out perfect for him, where he wouldn't get fired. But there was word from Purdue I'm told last week, that Brohm was already in talks with U of L. So I don't think there was ever a formal search at Louisville, I think it was just a matter of letting the dust settle from Satterfield leaving, so the announcement for Brohm could be made.
Login to view embedded media

Western Michigan HC job and UC

John Brice at football scoop is reporting that Gino Guidugli and Louisville OC Lance Taylor are candidates for the vacant Western Michigan job. Brice believes Taylor is the leader. Gino is likely a candidate to be Wisconsin’s OC and Lance Taylor might be a candidate to be UC’s OC (even though we’ve read that Coach Satterfield actually calls the plays). Mike Hart (Michigan RB coach) is also a candidate to replace Tim Lester.

WMU is expected to make its decision later this week.

I think that’s a nice group of finalists for Western Michigan.

This could be a double whamy for Louisville because Taylor was believed to be the likely interim HC at Louisville.

  • Like
Reactions: pdpoints1

Ethics and college football…

I love college football. No other sport comes close to generating the excitement I feel on a college football Saturday, but I also hate the direction the sport continues to go.

The traditions of college football continue to erode. Here‘s my very basic challenge- can you list all the teams in your school’s league in 5 minutes? If so, you advance to round 2. Can you list all the teams in each of the P5 conferences in 15 minutes? If you can do that, you’re playing for the big prize by advancing to the bonus round, list all the teams in the G5 leagues in 20 minutes. If you can do all that, you earn the prestigious title of Grand Poobah of College Football. As much as I love college football, I am not worthy of that title because leagues keep pilfering schools from other leagues, and I can’t keep up. Some leagues are now approaching the size of Jabba the Hutt, and geographically these leagues make no sense anymore.

National Signing Day, college coaching searches and the transfer portal are colliding in December to make a massive game of musical chairs for head coaches, assistant coaches, recruits and college players. The fans then pick through the carnage to see what jerseys they want under the tree for Xmas.

Ethics change too. One year the ethics are a coach won’t talk to another school before his season is over. But when schools show they don’t respect those types of ethics, coaches either adapt or miss opportunities. I admired Coach Fickell last season for his dedication to his UC players and refusal to talk to another school during his season, but after getting bypassed for the Notre Dame job, the ethics slide ruler collided with practicality, and Fickell was communicating with Wisconsin weeks prior to the end of the season.

I’ve covered a half dozen college coaches, and some I even admired. But all of them eventually disappointed me and some even used me to help them get a better job. I’m either not too smart or way too naive to have been duped that many times, but I keep wanting college football and the institutions/people in it to love the game as much as I do.

At the very least, I’d like for coaches to stop using the word “family“ when referring to their team. You don’t leave a family by not telling them you’ve taken another job somewhere else and leaving them behind. I still love college football, but I no longer idolize the major players because in the end it always ends the same for everyone. One group celebrates the new job and the riches they’ll get, and the other group is left scratching heads and wondering what just happened.

I’m happy UC has a new head coach and a new direction. I’m excited to see what happens next in player and coach acquisition, but I’m sure of only one thing- the new marriage will end badly at some point. But, I’d much rather lose a coach because he was successful than have him fired because he wasn’t. I’m not sure that’s ethical, but it’s the reality of college football these days.

Sean Lewis to Colorado as OC

I think it’s worth noting that Deion Sanders has hired former Kent State head coach Sean Lewis as the Buffs’ OC.

I have to give Deion credit. This is an excellent hire, and it’s going to be a nice raise for Lewis and a very good consolation prize after not getting the UC job.

On Twitter, there were some very vocal UC fans vociferously criticizing the idea of UC interviewing Lewis for the Bearcat HC job, and I think this hire shows how misguided those complaints were. Lewis really needed to get out of Kent. It’s a really tough job.

Football One INsider Take on Satterfield

Please do not copy/paste or summarize any portion of this post to other Web sites or message boards, as it is a direct violation of copyright laws and could result in the termination of your Rivals.com subscription per our terms of service. Thank you.

Guys, I had a long conversation with Ty Spalding, the publisher of the Rivals site covering Louisville, CardinalSports.com. I honestly just said, "Tell me about Satterfield, from your experience." And I wrote down everything Spalding told me. He told me I could use his name, so I'm doing so, but keeping this on the board. Still, lot of perspective here on Satterfield that's pretty interesting:



"He’s an offensive minded guy. He’ll be the playcaller. The bread and butter, the staple is the stretch zone run, off tackle. He did it at App State, at Louisville and he’ll implement it from day one. It’s basically an off-tackle run. I’d describe it as outside zone, stretch. That’s what he’s going to do, implement and build offense around. At Louisville, in his first year, I don’t think many ACC teams knew how to expect or prepare and the offense gave everyone fits. He’s an offense-minded guy. But as time went on and years went by, he didn’t change anything, add any new wrinkles and tried to do the same thing from year one in two, three and four. The book was out and he started to run into pushback. That’s when his offensive numbers fell off.

Beyond that, I can tell you that the biggest gripe with people in Louisville is that he never really embraced the city. A lot of fans felt like it was a bad fit, from a cultural standpoint. They felt like he distanced from inner city, from the community and that was something fans couldn’t get over. He’s from North Carolina. You can hear it in his voice, he’s a rural guy. Everyone during his tenure thought the first job that came open close to North Carolina, he’d jump. When the South Carolina stuff happened, they interviewed Satterfield and had they chose him, he’d be gone. The sense around here was he wanted to get back to the Carolinas. From there, his tenure, there was just a divide with the fan base. Whenever they’d play a good game, there was something fans wouldn’t be happy with. He didn’t lose enough to make a change made, but he didn’t win enough to earn an extension and raise. When you throw in the divide, some of that has to do with how he approached the rivalry game with Kentucky. They got blown out three years.

To end the season, a lot of fans were like, we have this recruiting class. The general consensus was we have to extend him, but from what I’m told, he and the AD met and Satterfield and his agent wanted a $500,000 a year raise. (AD Josh) Heird said, we’re not gonna do that. At that point, Scott and his agent got the hint, got the message they needed a reset, go somewhere else to get his career back on track. I would imagine that’s when all this came about. From a Louisville fan perspective, you have two sides. You have one that when you lose a coach to a program you think you’re better than, you’re embarrassed. But some say this is best for both sides. He didn’t get fired, he landed on his feet in a good position. It’s also good for Louisville, since fans didn’t show up to games. Even when winning, a loud majority wanted a change made. Here, you have a clean break. I think most Louisville fans were happy today. They know the class is special, but they’re not gonna sacrifice long term success for the recruiting class.

I think he’ll bring quite a few assistants with him. Brian Brown is a DC who’s been with Satt for years. Mark Ivey has been with him for years. I’d expect both to go with him. His defense is a 3-4 base. He took over a defense that was one of the worst in country and now it’s a top defense. He’s a good mind and the players seem to really like him. I’m expect him to go with Satt. Typically, Satterfield is very hands off with defense and took more responsibility with the defense when Louisville started season slow. By and large the defense played well. Scott is very loyal to his assistants. A lot wanted of people wanted to fire Brown, but he’ll live and die with his guys.

As far as what players thought of him, I think players going from (Bobby) Petrino to Satterfield, they definitely likes Scott’s temperament. They like that he brought them around the coaches’ families, to houses for dinners, meals. It was a more inviting locker room compared to Petrino. The knock on Scott is he’s not really an alpha male personality. For a while, there was a sense that the strength coach ran the program and acted as a bad cop, so Scott could be quiet behind the scenes. This happens everywhere but there were players who transferred out that they didn’t wanna lose. The consensus is Scott just never really evolved the offensive playbook.

Most people here knew he was gonna look to get out. Most knew that he’d probably accept a lateral move. We just thought it would be in the Carolinas, like NC State, USC. I didn’t think he was a good fit here.

I really think he had no choice, because he wasn’t gonna get an extension, he wasn’t gonna get raise and he was going up against fan base that wasn’t supporting him. No new fans coming on board, something was just off."

Football ***INsider: 12.5 UC Coaching Search Updates***

Please do not copy/paste or summarize any portion of this post to other Web sites or message boards, as it is a direct violation of copyright laws and could result in the termination of your Rivals.com subscription per our terms of service. Thank you.

Welp, I didn’t think we’d make it to Monday morning without a new hire, but here we are. This has been the most difficult coaching search to cover and I’ve covered a few now at three different schools. It’s been even more difficult because just about every interview conducted by AD John Cunningham in this search was done remotely, over Zoom. That’s made it tougher to track what’s going on, which I think is largely by design.

But throughout, I know we’re not the only ones struggling to keep up. Seems like no one outside of Cunningham and the coaches themselves know what’s going on. I definitely thought a hire would come yesterday, which came and went without one. And here we are on Monday, with the opening of the transfer portal, again without one. That said, a hire could come at any time, so don’t be surprised whenever word finally leaks out.

Here's the latest:

*This thing is insanely close to being done. I had an excellent source tell me this morning that whoever it is is on campus and will be today. So literally an announcement could come at any time. Basically, we know it's not Kerry Coombs, but we still haven't been able to zero in on exactly who it is. I've reached out to every source I've got trying to figure out who, so hopefully one of them can get back to me soon with more insight and confirm that yes, a hire has been made.

**I mean, we have scoured our sources to try to get a sense of what’s going on. And while it’s been tough, I can tell you that as of 10 pm ET last night, Cunningham had not told any potential candidates whether they had or had not received the job. So at that point, a hire had not been made.

**Sean Lewis continues to be the name who pops up most. It’s amazing, though, that if Lewis was the guy, that he wasn’t already hired. Can’t confirm, but this makes me think he’s not the top option. And at this point, he still could be the guy, but it’s tough to say it won’t be because other options turned down the position.

***We’ve reached out to sources with Mo Linguist and have not had much information returned. I do think Linguist is still in the mix, but there just hasn’t been a lot to go on. I did have a VERY trusted source tell me Lewis and Linguist couldn’t be more polar opposite. So it’s odd to have them both as likely finalists here. Whereas Lewis is all offense, Linguist is all defense.

****Willie Fritz was mentioned to us a couple of times last night, but I was told that might be because it came from another site. Outside of that, there hasn’t really been any mention of Fritz. It’s just tough seeing UC going that direction. Fritz won at Tulane, but remember, everything came together just this season, in year seven. Tulane did go 2-10 last year. He’s 62 and I’m just not sure that’s the right fit headed to the Big 12.

*****After his name gained traction after the Big 12 championship on Saturday, it’s gone pretty quiet with Garrett Riley. I still think there’s some smoke there, based on what I heard on Saturday, but again, not much has changed there, in terms of what is coming from sources.


Like all of you, I’m eagerly awaiting any word on a hire. It’s been so quiet as the weekend went on and that’s odd, considering UC really needs to make this hire soon, between less time to recruit before signing day and the transfer portal opening. I certainly didn’t see us getting to this point without a hire.
  • Like
Reactions: pdpoints1

Misc. information…

After offering Gino, Brown, Hitsch, and Tressel spots on his Wisconsin staff last week, Coach Fickell has started his second round of contacting the remaining UC staffers, but unlike when Dantonio was pressuring Narduzzi to go to Michigan State, Fick is showing more patience for the guys he wants.

Coombs will have plenty of options, but I think he’d like to stay in Cincinnati if possible. Walt Stewart will also have plenty of options, but I know he’d also like to remain at UC.

I called a staffer that worked under Butch Jones at UC today. He was effusive in his praise for Walt Stewart. I’ve heard Pat Fitzgerald at Northwestern is also hoping to add Stewart to his staff.

My call to the former UC staffer (to my surprise) said many coaching changes these days are done without the incoming head coach ever stepping foot on the new campus. We are seeing in this coaching search that the interviews are done on zoom, and I guess it’s not a stretch to think facilities can be highlighted remotely as well.

As I wrote in another thread, I’m really not concerned about UC’s ‘23 class. They’ll keep the kids that don’t have a more attractive offer, and the kids that really love UC. There could also be some additions the new coach might be able to bring. The more important additions will come from the transfer portal. Even though UC will probably lose most of their top recruits, the top rated kids don’t always work out, and the UC kids that love being a Bearcat, are the people that have built this program.

UC is entering the toughest football conference in its long history, and there were going to be some growing pains even if Fick had stayed. With this current scenario of a coaching change coupled with the early signing date, those growing pains will be even more pronounced so be prepared.

I’m convinced the lack of money in the NIL collective is an issue so if you contribute any money to the group CincyReigns, https://cincyreigns.org/ it is probably the best thing you can do to help the program. I made my contribution on Friday.

My additional advice for fans is to stay positive! It is counterproductive to go on social media and complain about your coach, and some UC are already doing just that.

I see some new members here, and I appreciate it since I signed up for a year after my subscription to Bearcat Journal ended, and I prefer smaller more civil discussion than dealing with emotional, out-of-control fans that I’ve seen elsewhere. And I hear from fans that feel the same way. Word of mouth is a powerful way to spread Bearcat Report’s mission. I’m here for another 11 months, even though I’m not a staffer, I’ll be posting mostly here as soon as the Coach search is over. Right now, I want to stay on Twitter and do what little bit I can to rally people for UC football.

Finally, please post as much as possible. It gives the site life, and I can assure you that no one is going to be rude- certainly not Sam, Jason or me. Message boards are only as good as the members who post.

Tim

Football ***INsider: 12.4 UC Coaching Search Updates***

Please do not copy/paste or summarize any portion of this post to other Web sites or message boards, as it is a direct violation of copyright laws and could result in the termination of your Rivals.com subscription per our terms of service. Thank you.

Good Sunday morning everyone! Wow! This has been an insanely interesting coaching search to cover. I appreciate all the discussion on the thread I started yesterday. I've absolutely loved hearing everyone's take and the healthy banter that ensued. We all want to know who the coach will be. And I can tell you we're exhausting all our resources to try to nail things down. As has been pointed put, John Cunningham has absolutely put a lid on this, which in this day and age, is absolutely admirable. It is incredibly hard to do that anywhere. So, below is our latest updates on what we're hearing. And again, Sam will add here as he sees fit, but everyone is absolutely welcome to chime in. Love the discussion!

*I can corroborate Justin Williams' report that Gino Guidugli has been told he will not get the job and will head to Wisconsin to join Luke Fickell's staff there. So as far as internal candidates to stay, honestly, whoever the new coach will basically have Walter Stewart and Kerry Coombs to work with. Pretty much everyone else is headed to Wisconsin. Either or both would be good to keep on board. But either way, I expect quite a bit of player turnover, as much as staff here.

**The three new names I'm hearing chatter on are TCU offensive coordinator Garrett Riley, Troy coach Jon Sumrall and Buffalo coach Mo Linguist. These are three very different scenarios and none have the natural tie to Cincinnati or Ohio like the other candidates. But I'll go into each.

***First off, Sean Lewis is still in play, though again, my same source that's close to him has told me that as of about 7 pm last night, he had not been offered the job and was still waiting to hear back from Cunningham. Of course, this also means he hasn't been told he's NOT getting the job. So I think Lewis has to remain in play here.

****Our friend Tim Adams threw out Riley's name here and I've gotten back conflicting reports here. It does sound like there's some smoke with Riley, just not sure how much. I had one source tell me Riley is very interested, but couldn't confirm whether or not he was on the plane spotted at Lunken Airport that arrived from Arlington yesterday. But then I had another Rivals source reach out to some coaches and was told by one coach that they absolutely couldn't see it because he has no experience in the region. BUUUT, UC will almost certainly have to recruit Texas more, playing four Texas schools on a regular basis, so that's not necessarily a detriment. Yes, Riley would have to recruit Ohio, Michigan and Kentucky, but he can hire assistants who know those areas well. Remember, the head coach doesn't usually go out recruiting a ton himself. That falls largely to the assistants. The head coach comes in to support the assistants. So I think Riley is definitely in play here. He's the one of the four names here, however, without head coaching experience.

*****I honestly have heard less on Sumrall and Linguist. But I have heard their names mentioned here, so I think each has to be in play. I don't believe Sumrall has had any on-campus visit, so of these four, I'd put him at least likely. And I really can't confirm a ton here with him, other than I do believe he's in play, based on what I'm hearing.

******Linguist I also have not heard a ton on. But aside from others reporting he's an option, I have heard his name. I first heard it Friday after Buffalo's game, but it was just from one source, so I didn't think a ton of it. But his name came up again last night, when I was trying to figure out where UC goes after Alex Golesh agreed to go to South Florida. I can tell you Golesh was never offered the job at UC and I think felt that he didn't want to pass a sure thing at USF for the potential of getting UC. I can get that.


Sooooooo, I'll update the hot board as well, but it sounds like we've got four (five if you count Coombs, though I don't expect him to be the guy). Updates here throughout the day when available, as an announcement could come as soon as later today.

Football ***INsider: 12.3 UC Coaching Search Updates***

Please do not copy/paste or summarize any portion of this post to other Web sites or message boards, as it is a direct violation of copyright laws and could result in the termination of your Rivals.com subscription per our terms of service. Thank you.

Good Saturday morning! Wanted to put up today's post before my kids wake up and it's still quiet in my house. That won't last long. We've got a visit to see one of Santa's helpers on tap...

*I'm fully aware of the word last night about Alex Golesh, that he was the guy. Yes, that report was premature. But it's still not out of play. I can confirm through multiple sources that Golesh has already interviewed on campus and I think that's partly where those reports stem from. It happens. Remember, unless you're Golesh or John Cunningham themselves, every info you get will at least be second-hand. And in coaching searches, it's usually, third, fourth or fifth-hand. It's why I do my best to check and double check any info I get, to verify as best as I can whether or not what a source tells me is true. So far now, that report might be premature, but it also might not be totally false.

**While Gino Guidugli is technically still in this, we're basically down to a top-two of Golesh and Sean Lewis. Players and alumni continue to lobby for Guidugli, as they should. He's a UC guy, played and coached for the Bearcats, is from Fort Thomas, I mean, he's a likable guy. But it just sounds like he's a backup at this point. That's no slight to him, he just doesn't have the experience that the other two have and it sounds like Cunningham doesn't want to go with an internal candidate. As with everything else, that could always change.

***One very, very good source confirmed what I had heard from another source, that as of early last night, Lewis had not heard one way or the other on whether or not he got the job. He's waiting like everyone else is. If a coach was hired, you'd let the other candidates know. Lewis could still be the guy, but while we heard all about him being the front-runner all week, that's definitely shifted.

****LOTS of breadcrumbs continue to lead towards Golesh as being the guy. But I haven't heard enough to definitively confirm that just yet. I can tell you that I have a couple of really good sources who regularly communicate with Golesh, who told me he hasn't responded to them, which also gives me reason to think he's the front-runner. But again, I'm not putting anything outside of here to suggest that, because I just don't have enough to confirm it.

Sam can add anything here, but know we're tapping into all our sources to deliver the best news. If we're first and break the hire, great. But we won't make a report unless we feel like we know pretty darn well. So there's a chance that even though we feel like we've had a good pulse on the search, we won't be first. That's out of our control.

More coming if and when available.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT